This is default featured post 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured post 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

Monday, August 15, 2011

Huntington's Disease Explained Simply

Cells in our body (except sperm cells and eggs) have two copies of every gene, one copy from your father, and the other from your mother. Genes are like blueprints or instruction manuals that tell the cell how to make proteins, the building blocks of the cell. Thus, genes and the proteins they encode for determine everything about the cell: how it grows, what it looks like, how it will respond to signals from its environment. Changes, or mutations, to these genes will cause changes to the proteins and affect the cell, much like a word-change in a sentence will change its meaning.

In Huntington’s Disease, a repetition of a CAG sequence in the gene encoding for the protein Huntingtin makes it clump together in our brain cells, ultimately making the brain cell die. For each CAG sequence in the genetic blueprint, the cell incorporates, one after another, an extra glutamate, a building block of protein, into Huntingtin. Longer repeats of the CAG sequence mean more glutamates are incorporated into the protein. It’s like a blueprint of a house that normally instructs an architect to build a chimney on the roof. One chimney is fine, but if the blueprint has an error and tells the architect to build 40 chimneys on the roof, the house would likely collapse, ruining not just the house, but damaging the area around it. Houses built with 50 or more chimneys would be even more unstable and cause more damage. Chimneys, and glutamate, aren’t inherently harmful, it’s their improper incorporation into houses and cells, respectively. In brain cells, the more glutamates in Huntingtin, the more protein clumps form, more severe the damage, and the lower the age of onset. This explains the variable age of onset of the disease, or the age at which symptoms arise; different people have different amounts of the CAG repeat.

The mechanism of the disease is still being researched, but here’s what we do know. The repetitive glutamates in the Huntington protein change the shape of the brain cells, affecting their function. The glutamate sends signals that constantly over-excite brain cells. Their overexcitement leads to cell damage, and ultimately cell death. Changes in the breakdown of nutrients will lead to the production of toxic chemicals known as free radicals. The regions of the brain that regulate movement, impulsivity, and learning are most affected in Huntington’s Disease. As a result of brain cell damage and death, Huntington’s have trouble controlling their movement, with rigid joints, difficulty chewing and swallowing, involuntary tics and writhing movements called chorea. Cognitive manifestations include impulsiveness, lack of empathy, memory loss, ultimately leading to dementia. These symptoms become progressively worse as time goes on.

The disease is dominantly inherited. Only one bad copy of the gene from either the mother or father will result in Huntington’s Disease. Children of people affected with the disease have a 50% chance of getting it from an affected parent, irrespective of whether the other parent has a normal copy of the gene. If both parents have Huntington’s Disease, offspring have a 75% change of being affected by the disease. 

Source: Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2007. 30:575-621

Sunday, August 14, 2011

No Science Sunday: Wine Edition


It's Sunday, the day of rest! I like to relax on Sundays and read books with big bag of Flaming Hot Cheetos and a few glasses of good wine.

Got a date or going to a fancy dinner? Looking to spend 9 or 10 bucks on the best bottle of wine to enjoy with your company? Go for a wine made in Portugal as a general rule of thumb. Given Portugal has the lowest wages in EU, they're pump out good wines at a comparatively low price.




25 bucks? No thanks.

Yesterday, I was at a wine shop looking for a good bottle of wine for a professor of mine, and I overheard a lady smugly complaining about how she is so sensitive to sulfites in "lesser wines" and it gives her headaches. I could tell she had no idea what she was talking about. Sulfite allergies manifest in asthmatic or anaphylactic reactions, never headaches. I guess some people like throwing around buzzwords they hear once at a wine tasting at a bar or read about Consumer Reports. Anyways, the salesman offered her a Conundrum, which she happily got.

Conundrum is definitely expensive, and I am not sure if they're worth the money, given that there any many superior wines priced a little less.  I got an Evolution from Oregon for myself. It's as good for only 15 dollars. I certainly can't tell the difference. YMMV.

Unrelated note: saved 70 bucks today by changing my own engine and cabin air filters myself.

Regulation of Morphology of Corn Smut, Ustilago maydis

Basidiomycota, in contrast to other fungi such as Ascomycota, produce basidia that yield four sexual spores called basidiospores. U. maydis is part of this phylum. Its mating-type is determined by a tetrapolar system with two unrelated loci, a and b. There are two idiomorphs for the a locus, a1 and a2. Haploid U. maydis cells have either the 4.5kb a1 locus with genes mfa1, pra1, and rfa2, or the 8kb a2 locus with genes mfa2, pra2, lga2, and rga2. mfa1 and mfa2 encode pheromone precursors, pra1 and pra2 genes encode pheromone receptors for the a2 and a1 pheromone, respectively. rfa2, lga2, and rga2 are thought to function within mitochondria. The pheromone encoded by one idiomorph will bind to the receptor of the opposite cell type, activating a signaling cascade that induces G2 arrest and the formation of conjugation hyphae. The b locus contains two genes, bE and bW, and regulates the switch to the pathogenic filamentous stage, as well as tumor induction and the formation of teliospores. The complex mating-type regulation is not specific to U. maydis, and other Basidiomycetes such as Schizophyllum commune and Coprinus cinereus.

Promycelium undergoes meiosis to produce saprophytic haploid cells. When in contact with corn, these sporidia exchange pheromones and become conjugative hyphae. These fuse to form a dikaryote, which is able to being intracellular invasion. Tumors are induced in which the fungi proliferates. Spores are formed and spread in the air and form a promycelium.

Higher fungi, like U. maydis, make ideal genetic models because they are easy to mate, transform, and select for. Observing metabolism, virulence, genotype is easier because they tend to be linked to readily apparent morphology. U. maydis’ relatedness to animal cells makes their study even more relevant to humans. Not only do does it have microtubule organization, nuclear migration, and nuclear envelop breakdown like in humans, U. maydis has homologues of Homo sapiens proteins that other, “higher” genetic models lack, such as Brh2, a BRCA2 (Breast Cancer Type 2 susceptibility protein) homologue. In vivo studies of Brh2 made it possible for geneticists to understand the function of BRCA2 in DNA repair and tumor suppression in humans. There is no doubt of U. maydis’ importance as a genetic model to study other complex mammalian cell processes. 

No pictures. No sources. Only excellence.

Saturday, August 13, 2011

Ethics

I designed two new banners. Let me know which one you prefer. Click to enlarge both of them.



Yesterday, I asked whether you would kill an innocent girl to cure the world of HIV/AIDS, ultimately saving millions of lives. Given that HIV and AIDS kills 6,500 people every day, leaving millions of children as orphans in Africa alone, is the killing of one innocent person justified?

I couldn't kill one person to save millions of lives because doing so means I have to ask myself, "How far would I go? How many people would I kill to save millions?" Let's ask the question again, except this time, you have to kill ten innocent people to cure the world of HIV/AIDS. Would you still do it? What about killing a hundred? A thousand? Many of you justified killing one person to save millions, but would you kill thousands of people? At what point would you stop and say, "Alright, this isn't ethical anymore."

To the people who said they would kill the girl yesterday, how many people would you kill to cure the world of AIDS?

Friday, August 12, 2011

Question of the Day: Anti-HIV Antibody Edition




CN3D 4.3. Click to enlarge.



Jmol. Click to enlarge.
The first is modeled by the researchers, using the CN3 program. There's more colors available and the graphics look better. The one on the bottom is the same anti-HIV antibody in the Jmol program that I meddled with a little bit (ID: 3RPI).

This antibody mimics CD4 binding, locking onto to the spikes of HIV-1 so HIV-1 can't bind to (CD4) white blood cells. By characterizing its unique structure, researchers can design many novel antibodies that could efficiently inhibit the virus' entry into host white blood cells. 

 Random ethical hypothetical question here: You are granted the ability to cure HIV and AIDS and save millions of lives, but in order to use this ability, you must kill an innocent girl. You must choose between curing HIV and killing someone. What would you do? Explain your reasoning. I'll post my answer tomorrow.

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Mesothelioma and Asbestos

First, the mesothelium. It's a frictionless monolayer lining that covers the internal organs. The luminal side has lots of microvilli that told fluids and proteins to allow intracoeolmic movement. It also helps leukocytes and other cells of the immune system to travel about in the fluid.




Mesothelium cells, with connective tissues.

How exactly does asbestos cause cancer? Well, it's made up of little tiny fibers that people inhale it. These fibers travel into the lungs and stick to its linings, damaging the membrane.  Intra-pleural inoculation of asbestos in rats have demonstrated that asbestos cause lesions within the lining, recruiting phagocytes and macrophages to the site of the lesion. The macrophages are part of the immune response, and they eat up cells which have asbestos in them. This in turn damages the macrophages and cause oxidative stress. Additionally, it is thought that smaller asbestos fibers can sometimes become entangled within the chromatin itself in the cell, and disrupt with the process of cellular division by interfering the packing and segregation of chromosomes. After many cycles of cellular division, the DNA damage accumulates. The subsequent damage induces the cell to undergo DNA repair, which is often error-prone. This is how asbestos damages the tissues, ultimately causing lesions to develop into a malignant tumor in the mesothelium.




Asbestos may interfere with cell division.
So why was asbestos use so widespread if the link between lung cancer and it was made in the early 19th century? Asbestos is a mineral that is heat-, friction-, and acid-resistant, easily obtained by mining, and easy to modify. These industrial merits are why companies today still incorporate asbestos into their products. Countries all over the world limit the use of asbestos. But whatever countries do to limit the use of asbestos, mesothelioma will still be a problem for years to come, because of there is long latency between asbestos exposure and the development of the disease. For example, the Japanese government expects the peak year for malignant mesothelioma to be in 2025. 

The widespread use of asbestos, the long latency period, the exclusive linkage between asbestos and malignant mesothelioma, and the fact that not all companies have enacted proper safety measures have opened the doors for a whole lot of lawsuits. People are seeking compensation, and in 1999, already 2 billion have been award to people. That's 2,000 million. No wonder there are lawyers and attorneys who specialize in mesothelioma cases.  Why not? Some mesothelioma lawyers have gotten recoveries of 3 million per victim. It's lucrative since not only is the five year survival rate very low (9%, so what's the point of a structured settlement?) and the treatment expensive, so many people were exposed to asbestos because of the American economy's emphasis on manufacturing (where contact with asbestos is most likely) after World War 2. On top of that, many companies that used asbestos were reluctant to get rid of asbestos, even when they knew the occupational hazards.

If you think you may have mesothelioma because you have the symptoms (weight loss, fever, cough, swelling due to fluid buildup) go get an MRI or a thoracoscopy (where they make an incision and put a camera to look into your chest).




Pleural mesothelioma tumor grows and effectively "shrinks" lung capacity. It affects 70% of patients.
Mesothelioma affects people from all walks of life. Steve McQueen died of a heart attack in Juarez, Mexico, after undergoing mesothelioma treatment. He was exposed to asbestos during his time in the United States Navy and during his long career as a race car driver. At the time, asbestos was used to insulate the piping on the boats and was also incorporated into  his racing suits.

Monday, August 8, 2011

Genetic Engineering and Gene Therapy


Our genes play a role in a lot of things: our chances of getting cancer or diabetes, about how tall we will get, our looks, how long we live, whether or not we get genetic disorders like Huntington's Disease, how fat we get. Gene therapy and genetic engineering has the potential to change all of that. In the movie Gattaca, people are genetically engineered to be physically perfect, with great stamina, perfect vision, the whole shebang. People who haven't undergone genetic engineering are called invalids and are forced to take on menial jobs like janitorial work, for instance, because of their predisposition to diseases and physical abnormalities.
Mesothelioma symptoms 
The question of the day is... If you are expecting a baby with a genetic disorder like diabetes or Huntington's Disease, would you have your baby's genetic makeup altered to prevent said genetic disorder? If you could choose whether your children were predisposed to cancer or not, would you make that choice, or leave it to nature? What about more trivial things that can improve your child's quality of life and give him more opportunities, like height, longevity, or eye color? Should people be allowed to make these choices, if science ever makes these choices viable? More importantly, if these choices ever become available, is it okay for society to discriminate based on our genotype? Mesothelioma structured settlement

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More